I remember during the Trump's debate against Chris Wallace, Wallace claimed the President was trying to ban "workplace sensitivity training". Because that's all CRT is right?
I eavesdropped on my wife's mandatory training class when she was working from home and it was exactly that nonsense - it's not enough to not be racist, you MUST be an ALLY to people in historically oppressed identity groups.
Thankfully my company only has some very basic sexual harassment stuff.
I really wish I agreed, but I live near a deep, deep blue area and I guarantee at least half of the white people and 95% of the minorities would have forced the pollsters to write in "extra super incredibly pro CRT forever" because "very favorable" doesn't even come close to describing their undying zeal.
America hasn't existed for a very long time. The people who live in the big cities do not live in the same country as the rest of us. If you never go there, you have no fucking idea.
I'm not even remotely joking when I say that witnessing the level of brainwashing they're on is one of the most disturbing things I've ever seen. It's like a form of dementia, but it stops just short of killing you so you end up a brainless zombie and stay that way for decades. I'd watch every shock video on the internet if it would erase my knowledge of what progressive doctrine can do to a man.
Considering CRT comes with all the other diversity initiatives, the maximum against is somewhere around 50%. No way women would be against something that serves their "equality" racket.
24% of white men with no degree are for it and 34% of those with degree? This is insane, honestly is beyond insane.
How in the world are white men without degree for a theory that consider them privileged do to the color of their skin. Is a theory that considers the white child of a plumber more privileged then the daughter of Obama.
This is incredibly depressing, we deserve it, I'm incredibly disappointed in men.
And of course black people and a lot of hispanics are for it, 69% of blacks and 42% of hispanics. But I can't blame them, under CRT they are favored, they deserve free stuff and affirmative action.
This is just the level of aggressive indoctrination and apologetics in academia and cultural structures.
Look, they do the same shit with Xenu and Scientology.
Scientology literally doesn't teach Xenu until you are fucking years into the organization. People at the lowest tiers literally don't even know that it's a thing. They are literally told it is a lie. This is because people in upper tiers are told that if people in lower tiers are told the truth it will kill them.
This is why Breadtube was attacking Lindsay for pointing out an example in a CRT textbook as (completely fictional and unrelated to CRT).
They will literally lie to your face, and you have to prove their own positions to them. Then when you do, they argue you made up a strawman that they never believed in. Then they will go on pushing the same shit later.
If you argue with a low level Scientologist, they will tell you that Xenu is fiction and they won't know that it's real. If you argue with a high level Scientologist, they will lie to you and tell you it isn't real, even though they know it's true and we have documents. If you show it to them, they will lie to you again and say it's made up. Even if their fucking signature is on it.
This is the fundamental difficulty of trying to convince people the truth of individuals acting only in "bad faith".
Have you ever been stopped by the police in the US and thought to yourself: "Hmmmm, this situation would have been vastly improved if only I had been black."?
"Is a theory that considers the white child of a plumber more privileged then the daughter of Obama."
No one is comparing individual children you fucking moron. This is a strawman argument and a fucking stupid one at that and shows the level of nuance you're capable of handling, which is none.
If you want to try and claim comparing Obama's daughter with a plumber's daughter like that's an honest argument versus proven police tactics against people of minority as the same type of argument, then sure. We did the same thing. If you don't have a single shred of nuance in your body and your arguing from a false position.
If you can find an extreme example were a theory is wrong it proves the theory wrong. If you find an example (although I do not agree with your example) were a theory applies correctly it does not prove the theory correct.
At least that is how it works in math. So my argument is a valid rebuttal to CRT, your argument is not a valid point for CRT.
They absolutely compare individual children and people. CRT unequivocally asserts that a white homeless man living on the street is more privileged than Barack Obama due to the assertion that the Liberal Political order creates a political structure of race, which it then uses to suppress the oppressed population for political submission, control, and economic exploitation through capitalism. This is best expounded upon in Falguni Sheth's "Toward a Political Philosophy of Race".
Critical Race Theory uses the Marxist historical dialectic of Oppressor and Oppressed to explicitly prevent whites from being able to functionally deny racism. It asserts that the Liberal systems construction of race is foundation to every aspect of a Liberal society, and as such there is no reason to question if racism asserts itself, but to identify how racism has asserted itself in every form.
As a Marxist dialectic, it still operates off of the assumption that the political races have Objective Value in a society, and that the Surplus Value of a political race within a society is Privilege (a racial bourgeoisie), and the Undervaluing of a political race is Oppression (a racial proletariat).
No individual member of a political race can exist outside of their racial ordering within a liberal society according to the Marxist dialectic and CRT. Each individual is an extension of their racial ordering within the Liberal society, and as such any individual differences between members of a different race can still be asserted as differences between races within the Liberal order.
As such, a homeless white man is always more privileged then Barack Obama because he exists as an extensions of his white political bourgeoisie. His individual choices that may have lead him to that position of being homeless are irrelevant because we assert that in a Liberal society the individuals of a white political community will still have each and every aspect of the Liberal society built to support all choices of all whites. Where as the reverse is true for the black political proletariat.
What is particularly important is to recognize how dehumanizing this attitude is towards the individuals because it promotes contempt for the worst among the racial-bourgeoisie, sympathy among worst individuals of the racial-proletariat, and idol worship among the successful racial-proletariat. It is not only that each and every single individual of the racial-bourgeois is individually privileged as an extension of their collective, it is that the direct comparison of individuals within this perspective lead you to believe that the worst among the racial-bourgeoisie are deserving of their extermination.
See, the individual racial-bourgeois must be an inherently inferior individual because he is both homeless and white. A black woman (a racial proletariat) would have long since died for making similar mistakes. Society uplifts the homeless white man so much that it compensates for his innate failure. The middle-class black woman, however, is effectively individually superior to the wealthiest and most powerful white men in the world because she has survived and conquered much more than any individual white man will ever face due to the Liberal order's protection of his social status.
This perspective is what leads to people easily concluding that Black Supremacism is inherently natural, as the innate superiority of black people is the only reason they are able to overcome the Liberal order's oppression of them, and it is the explanation for how the Liberal order has become so wealthy from exploiting them.
This explanation is not something you are going to learn from listening to Breadtube explicitly lie to you. The same way Athiesm+ people lied when they said "Feminism is just thinking women are people". This intentional reductionism is a form of compartmentalization and information hiding from Useful Idiots that can re-enforce the propaganda. People like this person are played for fools by their masters. The only point where he will accept my explanation is when he has become so fully indoctrinated that he sees it as a good thing. Until he's been indoctrinated to the higher tier, he will simply be lied to, and told to repeat buzzwords.
As with Feminism, we know it is not just "believing women have rights", that is why there is an entire academic field dedicated to expounding on Feminist doctrines. Similarly, Communism isn't just "sharing", National Socialism isn't just "tradition", Post-modernism isn't just "questioning the familiar", and Critical Theory isn't just "thinking critically". These are actually quite convoluted ideologies and philosophies that actually require a significant amount of mental effort, but the activists don't want to push that onto their foot-soldiers. The Useful Idiots and foot-soldiers only exist to die happy for the cause, and so they need not be trouble with the nuance that he is accusing you of ignoring.
So yeah, how do you get to the Useful Idiots? Well, most normal people are easy to get to because they already know they are kind of ignorant, you just have to walk them through the logic of what they are saying and thinking because most of what the Left does is emotional and psychological conditioning.
The activists on the other hand, we have to kick in the teeth with truth. They know that they are lying, so we shove it in their face until we feel something break.
I started reading the first paragraph and it already made fucking lol by the end of the first line. Bunch of fucking nonsense. Show me any document saying that a homeless white person lives a more privileged life than a former president of the United States. You've broken the argument down to such a basic level that you've made yourself into a fucking idiot.
Congratulations. You've fallen for fear porn propaganda. I'm not even reading the rest and the fact you threw Marxism in there for the big old red scare is double laughable.
It's fucking pathetic that people with your train of through even exist.
You're not aware of the deconstructionist chains leading from Marxism -> Critical Theory -> Critical Race Theory? Or you think it's a right-wing myth? The other guy isn't just making things up.
Now here's a thread where the same guy asserts Equity is Marxism, and you could at least make an argument there that calling it Marxist was hyperbolic, although it's not exactly a tenuous link either. (basic Thomas Sowell stuff)
But the schools of thought that birthed CRT are well-documented.
Have you ever been stopped by the police in the US and thought to yourself: "Hmmmm, this situation would have been vastly improved if only I had been black."?
Per capita of criminals and pull-overs to police violence upon them, being white means you're more likely to be shot. Once you've already been pulled over, being black is an absolute increase to your survivability. On top of this, did you know a white man had a cop put a knee on his neck for over 6 minutes, and kill him? And this happened AFTER Saint Floyd? Of course you don't, because while it happened, there is NO OUTRAGE OVER VIOLENCE AGAINST WHITES. You hold significant defensive power being black in a police situation, because they know if they act even slightly out of line, their asses better be ready.
That's just statistical fact: White criminals are shot more often than black criminals on a per-criminal-capita basis. So no lying and comparing to general population, we're talking the "what is 13% but also 56% according to FBI statistics" number of people, on the 56% side. The criminals. We don't care about people who've never been pulled over, because they're not part of the equation.
And when you're shot, if you're white, ain't no one caring one shit. Police brutality can go about with zero repercussions. If you're black, there CLEARLY is repercussions, we see it every day in the newspaper we read by the light of the burning cities.
I bet that poor fool who was executed via knee-to-neck would have preferred to have been black like George Floyd. Then his death would have had meaning, his family set for life, his friends made millionaires. Instead, they foot the bill for his funeral on debt, because no. one. cares. about. it.
Wow! Spreading awareness on the .win network! How virtuous of you. How signalous of you! You're an activist now! We should all thank you for the hard work you've done.
You've gone and done one step above absofuckinglutely nothing. Congratulations.
Actually it does, it says that whites as a group are privileged vs blacks as a group. The theory does not take in to account a white child from a poor country, like Bulgaria or Romania for instance, vs the son of a black millionaire.
So the theory in fact does exactly that. Under CRT the color of your skin is what matters.
I've had this argument before on reddit and I've seen people argue that the millionaire would have been even richer if he was white. That is not proven, you can't prove that race had any implication in the guy becoming a millionaire and second his child has done nothing to earn his advantage over a poor white kid but CRT would still blame the poor white kid of having some form of pass me down privilege.
I've seen no proof from you or anyone else that would refute my example about CRT.
As for being stop by the police. Talk to an average black guy, with a family, that does not wear clothes from the ghettos, check what experiences they had with the police. You will be surprised to find out they have had the same fucking experience as a white guy who dresses nice and does not smell like weed. And if you are a white guy that has tatoos, messy hair, glazed eyes and smells like weed be the fuck sure that the police is not going to treat you well.
Black people do not have a police racism problem, they have a cultural problem and the sooner they distance themselves from that the better.
If you do not believe me talk to black people at work about it and see what they have to say.
And read some damn Thomas Sowell you racist brain dead idiot before promoting a retarded racist propaganda designed to radicalize the country around racial lines.
it says that whites as a group are privileged vs blacks as a group. The theory does not take in to account a white child from a poor country, like Bulgaria or Romania for instance, vs the son of a black millionaire.
OF COURSE IT DOESNT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE SON OF A BLACK MILLIONAIRE BECAUSE IT'S LOOKING AT THE OVERALL GROUPS.
You fucking moron.
Do the fucking math on how many sons of black millionaires there are versus how many sons of white millionaires there are and come back with those numbers with a straight fucking face and still try to tell me your comparison is worthwhile.
You dunce cap. Not the only pointy hat that you probably wear.
You make the same point as I do but with a different conclusion. CRT does make broad generalizations on groups of people this leads to examples as I mentioned. You however think that is not important because you consider that there are not enough black millionaires.
CRT is an oversimplified racist theory that sees everything thru the lens of race, ignores the data that it does not like, ignores individual actions or culture as factors, is built from the conclusion and then justified and all of this with a malicious intent to divide and gain power.
I just think you are stupid as fuck. I thought you are like haterjuice trying to just cause some reaction but you are just stupid. I do miss that troll.
Hispanics approve 42%, that is a lot of them.
As for men vs women, women still benefit under marxism, they have been the prime beneficiary and the ones that pushed most for it.
If anything the stats for women are less then I expected 23% without degree and 44% for those with degree. I would have expected something like 70% of those with degrees, maybe more.
White men are to blame here, way to many white men seem ok with being portrayed as evil do to their skin color.
I remember during the Trump's debate against Chris Wallace, Wallace claimed the President was trying to ban "workplace sensitivity training". Because that's all CRT is right?
I eavesdropped on my wife's mandatory training class when she was working from home and it was exactly that nonsense - it's not enough to not be racist, you MUST be an ALLY to people in historically oppressed identity groups.
Thankfully my company only has some very basic sexual harassment stuff.
It's probably closer to 80% disapproval, since polls are lies.
I really wish I agreed, but I live near a deep, deep blue area and I guarantee at least half of the white people and 95% of the minorities would have forced the pollsters to write in "extra super incredibly pro CRT forever" because "very favorable" doesn't even come close to describing their undying zeal.
America hasn't existed for a very long time. The people who live in the big cities do not live in the same country as the rest of us. If you never go there, you have no fucking idea.
I'm not even remotely joking when I say that witnessing the level of brainwashing they're on is one of the most disturbing things I've ever seen. It's like a form of dementia, but it stops just short of killing you so you end up a brainless zombie and stay that way for decades. I'd watch every shock video on the internet if it would erase my knowledge of what progressive doctrine can do to a man.
NB4 it gets renamed and the AP style guide forces the CRT name to get dropped forever.
That is way too low of a percentage for against.
Considering CRT comes with all the other diversity initiatives, the maximum against is somewhere around 50%. No way women would be against something that serves their "equality" racket.
And 37% of the people that do are useful idiots that have been brainwashed to believe it’s simply “diversity.”
Summery of the typical useful idiot's understanding of CRT: "Don't be Racist."
That's all they think it is. So they also think being against CRT is being against teaching children not to be racist.
Only the MOST useful idiots actually know what CRT is, and push it on the rest.
Those last ones are referred to as Simps.
And in some cases: Voluntary Sonderkommandos.
24% of white men with no degree are for it and 34% of those with degree? This is insane, honestly is beyond insane.
How in the world are white men without degree for a theory that consider them privileged do to the color of their skin. Is a theory that considers the white child of a plumber more privileged then the daughter of Obama.
This is incredibly depressing, we deserve it, I'm incredibly disappointed in men.
And of course black people and a lot of hispanics are for it, 69% of blacks and 42% of hispanics. But I can't blame them, under CRT they are favored, they deserve free stuff and affirmative action.
This is just the level of aggressive indoctrination and apologetics in academia and cultural structures.
Look, they do the same shit with Xenu and Scientology.
Scientology literally doesn't teach Xenu until you are fucking years into the organization. People at the lowest tiers literally don't even know that it's a thing. They are literally told it is a lie. This is because people in upper tiers are told that if people in lower tiers are told the truth it will kill them.
This is why Breadtube was attacking Lindsay for pointing out an example in a CRT textbook as (completely fictional and unrelated to CRT).
They will literally lie to your face, and you have to prove their own positions to them. Then when you do, they argue you made up a strawman that they never believed in. Then they will go on pushing the same shit later.
If you argue with a low level Scientologist, they will tell you that Xenu is fiction and they won't know that it's real. If you argue with a high level Scientologist, they will lie to you and tell you it isn't real, even though they know it's true and we have documents. If you show it to them, they will lie to you again and say it's made up. Even if their fucking signature is on it.
This is the fundamental difficulty of trying to convince people the truth of individuals acting only in "bad faith".
Have you ever been stopped by the police in the US and thought to yourself: "Hmmmm, this situation would have been vastly improved if only I had been black."?
No one is comparing individual children you fucking moron. This is a strawman argument and a fucking stupid one at that and shows the level of nuance you're capable of handling, which is none.
Fucking morons like you are why the world sucks.
Well you've got half your username right.
You presented an individual situation divorced from cultural context, and then you immediately chastized another person for doing the same thing.
You're a fucking idiot lol
If you want to try and claim comparing Obama's daughter with a plumber's daughter like that's an honest argument versus proven police tactics against people of minority as the same type of argument, then sure. We did the same thing. If you don't have a single shred of nuance in your body and your arguing from a false position.
If you can find an extreme example were a theory is wrong it proves the theory wrong. If you find an example (although I do not agree with your example) were a theory applies correctly it does not prove the theory correct.
At least that is how it works in math. So my argument is a valid rebuttal to CRT, your argument is not a valid point for CRT.
/u/Galen , literally: this is my example.
They absolutely compare individual children and people. CRT unequivocally asserts that a white homeless man living on the street is more privileged than Barack Obama due to the assertion that the Liberal Political order creates a political structure of race, which it then uses to suppress the oppressed population for political submission, control, and economic exploitation through capitalism. This is best expounded upon in Falguni Sheth's "Toward a Political Philosophy of Race".
Critical Race Theory uses the Marxist historical dialectic of Oppressor and Oppressed to explicitly prevent whites from being able to functionally deny racism. It asserts that the Liberal systems construction of race is foundation to every aspect of a Liberal society, and as such there is no reason to question if racism asserts itself, but to identify how racism has asserted itself in every form.
As a Marxist dialectic, it still operates off of the assumption that the political races have Objective Value in a society, and that the Surplus Value of a political race within a society is Privilege (a racial bourgeoisie), and the Undervaluing of a political race is Oppression (a racial proletariat).
No individual member of a political race can exist outside of their racial ordering within a liberal society according to the Marxist dialectic and CRT. Each individual is an extension of their racial ordering within the Liberal society, and as such any individual differences between members of a different race can still be asserted as differences between races within the Liberal order.
As such, a homeless white man is always more privileged then Barack Obama because he exists as an extensions of his white political bourgeoisie. His individual choices that may have lead him to that position of being homeless are irrelevant because we assert that in a Liberal society the individuals of a white political community will still have each and every aspect of the Liberal society built to support all choices of all whites. Where as the reverse is true for the black political proletariat.
What is particularly important is to recognize how dehumanizing this attitude is towards the individuals because it promotes contempt for the worst among the racial-bourgeoisie, sympathy among worst individuals of the racial-proletariat, and idol worship among the successful racial-proletariat. It is not only that each and every single individual of the racial-bourgeois is individually privileged as an extension of their collective, it is that the direct comparison of individuals within this perspective lead you to believe that the worst among the racial-bourgeoisie are deserving of their extermination.
See, the individual racial-bourgeois must be an inherently inferior individual because he is both homeless and white. A black woman (a racial proletariat) would have long since died for making similar mistakes. Society uplifts the homeless white man so much that it compensates for his innate failure. The middle-class black woman, however, is effectively individually superior to the wealthiest and most powerful white men in the world because she has survived and conquered much more than any individual white man will ever face due to the Liberal order's protection of his social status.
This perspective is what leads to people easily concluding that Black Supremacism is inherently natural, as the innate superiority of black people is the only reason they are able to overcome the Liberal order's oppression of them, and it is the explanation for how the Liberal order has become so wealthy from exploiting them.
This explanation is not something you are going to learn from listening to Breadtube explicitly lie to you. The same way Athiesm+ people lied when they said "Feminism is just thinking women are people". This intentional reductionism is a form of compartmentalization and information hiding from Useful Idiots that can re-enforce the propaganda. People like this person are played for fools by their masters. The only point where he will accept my explanation is when he has become so fully indoctrinated that he sees it as a good thing. Until he's been indoctrinated to the higher tier, he will simply be lied to, and told to repeat buzzwords.
As with Feminism, we know it is not just "believing women have rights", that is why there is an entire academic field dedicated to expounding on Feminist doctrines. Similarly, Communism isn't just "sharing", National Socialism isn't just "tradition", Post-modernism isn't just "questioning the familiar", and Critical Theory isn't just "thinking critically". These are actually quite convoluted ideologies and philosophies that actually require a significant amount of mental effort, but the activists don't want to push that onto their foot-soldiers. The Useful Idiots and foot-soldiers only exist to die happy for the cause, and so they need not be trouble with the nuance that he is accusing you of ignoring.
So yeah, how do you get to the Useful Idiots? Well, most normal people are easy to get to because they already know they are kind of ignorant, you just have to walk them through the logic of what they are saying and thinking because most of what the Left does is emotional and psychological conditioning.
The activists on the other hand, we have to kick in the teeth with truth. They know that they are lying, so we shove it in their face until we feel something break.
I think you meant to tag u/Galean/. :)
Thanks, that helps.
I started reading the first paragraph and it already made fucking lol by the end of the first line. Bunch of fucking nonsense. Show me any document saying that a homeless white person lives a more privileged life than a former president of the United States. You've broken the argument down to such a basic level that you've made yourself into a fucking idiot.
Congratulations. You've fallen for fear porn propaganda. I'm not even reading the rest and the fact you threw Marxism in there for the big old red scare is double laughable.
It's fucking pathetic that people with your train of through even exist.
I wasn't talking to you.
You're not aware of the deconstructionist chains leading from Marxism -> Critical Theory -> Critical Race Theory? Or you think it's a right-wing myth? The other guy isn't just making things up.
Now here's a thread where the same guy asserts Equity is Marxism, and you could at least make an argument there that calling it Marxist was hyperbolic, although it's not exactly a tenuous link either. (basic Thomas Sowell stuff)
But the schools of thought that birthed CRT are well-documented.
BLM is Marxism. Antifa is Marxism. The US is socialist. Biden is a communist. I feel like it's the 80s again.
Very appropriate considering how stupid and basic many of his takes have been lately.
Per capita of criminals and pull-overs to police violence upon them, being white means you're more likely to be shot. Once you've already been pulled over, being black is an absolute increase to your survivability. On top of this, did you know a white man had a cop put a knee on his neck for over 6 minutes, and kill him? And this happened AFTER Saint Floyd? Of course you don't, because while it happened, there is NO OUTRAGE OVER VIOLENCE AGAINST WHITES. You hold significant defensive power being black in a police situation, because they know if they act even slightly out of line, their asses better be ready.
That's just statistical fact: White criminals are shot more often than black criminals on a per-criminal-capita basis. So no lying and comparing to general population, we're talking the "what is 13% but also 56% according to FBI statistics" number of people, on the 56% side. The criminals. We don't care about people who've never been pulled over, because they're not part of the equation.
And when you're shot, if you're white, ain't no one caring one shit. Police brutality can go about with zero repercussions. If you're black, there CLEARLY is repercussions, we see it every day in the newspaper we read by the light of the burning cities.
I bet that poor fool who was executed via knee-to-neck would have preferred to have been black like George Floyd. Then his death would have had meaning, his family set for life, his friends made millionaires. Instead, they foot the bill for his funeral on debt, because no. one. cares. about. it.
Oh, so wait, you didn't take to the streets and organize for that poor white guy?
Whites are the worst, they don't even care about each other.
Did you know that in the US 65% of white crime is done against white people?
This white on white crime needs to stop.
Get fucked bigot.
I'm here talking about it. You're not. Get outta here, trollop.
Wow! Spreading awareness on the .win network! How virtuous of you. How signalous of you! You're an activist now! We should all thank you for the hard work you've done.
You've gone and done one step above absofuckinglutely nothing. Congratulations.
I've enlightened you, poor now-less-ignorant soul. That's one more. Every bit counts.
Actually it does, it says that whites as a group are privileged vs blacks as a group. The theory does not take in to account a white child from a poor country, like Bulgaria or Romania for instance, vs the son of a black millionaire.
So the theory in fact does exactly that. Under CRT the color of your skin is what matters. I've had this argument before on reddit and I've seen people argue that the millionaire would have been even richer if he was white. That is not proven, you can't prove that race had any implication in the guy becoming a millionaire and second his child has done nothing to earn his advantage over a poor white kid but CRT would still blame the poor white kid of having some form of pass me down privilege.
I've seen no proof from you or anyone else that would refute my example about CRT.
As for being stop by the police. Talk to an average black guy, with a family, that does not wear clothes from the ghettos, check what experiences they had with the police. You will be surprised to find out they have had the same fucking experience as a white guy who dresses nice and does not smell like weed. And if you are a white guy that has tatoos, messy hair, glazed eyes and smells like weed be the fuck sure that the police is not going to treat you well.
Black people do not have a police racism problem, they have a cultural problem and the sooner they distance themselves from that the better.
If you do not believe me talk to black people at work about it and see what they have to say.
And read some damn Thomas Sowell you racist brain dead idiot before promoting a retarded racist propaganda designed to radicalize the country around racial lines.
OF COURSE IT DOESNT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE SON OF A BLACK MILLIONAIRE BECAUSE IT'S LOOKING AT THE OVERALL GROUPS.
You fucking moron.
Do the fucking math on how many sons of black millionaires there are versus how many sons of white millionaires there are and come back with those numbers with a straight fucking face and still try to tell me your comparison is worthwhile.
You dunce cap. Not the only pointy hat that you probably wear.
And fuck Sowell, he's a twitter hack.
You make the same point as I do but with a different conclusion. CRT does make broad generalizations on groups of people this leads to examples as I mentioned. You however think that is not important because you consider that there are not enough black millionaires.
CRT is an oversimplified racist theory that sees everything thru the lens of race, ignores the data that it does not like, ignores individual actions or culture as factors, is built from the conclusion and then justified and all of this with a malicious intent to divide and gain power.
I just think you are stupid as fuck. I thought you are like haterjuice trying to just cause some reaction but you are just stupid. I do miss that troll.
Nah, the world sucks because you hate yourself.
This data is completely useless, it separates by age and gender, but doesn't combine them to give data for young men vs young women.
Still, that +7% spread overall tells us a lot. People say college brainwashes men, but it's a +3% spread, still way below women.
Hispanics do not approve, perhaps because they know they are yesterday's poor oppressed and are now not cared about by anyone.
Hispanics approve 42%, that is a lot of them. As for men vs women, women still benefit under marxism, they have been the prime beneficiary and the ones that pushed most for it. If anything the stats for women are less then I expected 23% without degree and 44% for those with degree. I would have expected something like 70% of those with degrees, maybe more.
White men are to blame here, way to many white men seem ok with being portrayed as evil do to their skin color.
38% approval is worrying. That's an awful lot of people in need of a helicopter.
I agree that this is a good thing, but we're going to have to harp on it. The Euphamism treadmil is especially easy for the Left.
The Soviet Backed Communists in the Spanish Revolution called the Democratic Socialists "Fascist Trotskyism".
All they have to do is create a new label, declare that they were always at war with East Asia, and they will say no one ever advocated CRT at all.
Good and more parents need to speak up.
38% is way too much.