TheImpossible1
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (141)
sorted by:
Taking on the (extremely low) health risk of birth control as a sacrifice offsets the massive financial gain they acquire out of the relationship.
When you're not providing anything, you don't get to dictate the terms.
If you insist on looking it as merely transactional, then they are providing sex, and possibly, exclusive sex (in commited relationships). Most would reckon that very valuable.
I also challenge the risk is low. It is among the greater of risks among drugs. And for no medical benefit. They in fact are reproductive poisons. The same "benefit" (non conception of children) can be achieved with barrier methods (no side effects) or abstinence (no side effects).
Only if you're imprisoned by your urges. If not, you would consider it merely a weak benefit along the lines of a free smartwatch with your expensive iPhone contract, not a valuable proposition. Societal brainwashing led by women's control has created a massive overvaluation of the meager benefits they offer.
How many women have died from birth control since the first year it was available? Probably less than allowing them to speak has killed men through depression, suicide and consequences of policy they pushed for...in a single week.
Hundreds if not thousands. Only a tiny number get reported, they rest are just random strokes or whatever. Big pharma needs its money. Still though, any risk is too much when risk free avenues exist.
You are right that sex itself isn't that valuable, which would make me think you more amenable to abstinence. But children are valuable. And no amount of money can buy you one. Your mileage, of course, may vary.
That sounds like a conspiracy theory that goes with patriarchy and other mythical oppression of women.
It's not that I particularly value sex or don't value it. It's the fact that in your idea a partner contributes zero, then demands you do what she wants to protect her from negligible risk. It's an entitlement complex more than anything else.
I'm of the belief that if you really need a partner, them challenging what you want or asking you to sacrifice is a sign of ungratefulness and you should tell them to take a hike.
Children have no value to me, why on earth would I want to put someone else through the hellscape that is a feminist controlled world order?