TheImpossible1
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (141)
sorted by:
Because the risk offsets their financial gain.
Who's risk? And what financial gain?
Taking on the (extremely low) health risk of birth control as a sacrifice offsets the massive financial gain they acquire out of the relationship.
When you're not providing anything, you don't get to dictate the terms.
If you insist on looking it as merely transactional, then they are providing sex, and possibly, exclusive sex (in commited relationships). Most would reckon that very valuable.
I also challenge the risk is low. It is among the greater of risks among drugs. And for no medical benefit. They in fact are reproductive poisons. The same "benefit" (non conception of children) can be achieved with barrier methods (no side effects) or abstinence (no side effects).
Only if you're imprisoned by your urges. If not, you would consider it merely a weak benefit along the lines of a free smartwatch with your expensive iPhone contract, not a valuable proposition. Societal brainwashing led by women's control has created a massive overvaluation of the meager benefits they offer.
How many women have died from birth control since the first year it was available? Probably less than allowing them to speak has killed men through depression, suicide and consequences of policy they pushed for...in a single week.