Notice how they do that with characters that are already known and liked. No one cares that much if it is a new character, but they want to ruin already liked characters.
A single, subtle line in a book that almost nobody is going to buy is now "ruining" a character that has always been known as a male dragon using a female gnome's form? You're either acting deranged, or you're allowing sensationalist idiots to manipulate you into getting angry over nothing.
A single, subtle line in a book that almost nobody is going to buy is now "ruining" a character that has always been known as a male dragon using a female gnome's form?
If that's ruining anything, you're psychotic and why nobody takes us seriously. And this isn't optics shit, this is just me not wanting to be associated with idiots.
There is a big cultural war going on. This isn't an isolated incidence in a void. Also, this isn't my first Rodeo with Blizzard. When they do this, I know exactly where they're going with this and what they're aiming at, and I refuse to entertain it for one milisecond. If this charactization happened 100 years ago, perhaps we'd be having a different tone of conversation.
Notice how they do that with characters that are already known and liked. No one cares that much if it is a new character, but they want to ruin already liked characters.
A single, subtle line in a book that almost nobody is going to buy is now "ruining" a character that has always been known as a male dragon using a female gnome's form? You're either acting deranged, or you're allowing sensationalist idiots to manipulate you into getting angry over nothing.
Yeah.
If that's ruining anything, you're psychotic and why nobody takes us seriously. And this isn't optics shit, this is just me not wanting to be associated with idiots.
Put aside the name calling.
There is a big cultural war going on. This isn't an isolated incidence in a void. Also, this isn't my first Rodeo with Blizzard. When they do this, I know exactly where they're going with this and what they're aiming at, and I refuse to entertain it for one milisecond. If this charactization happened 100 years ago, perhaps we'd be having a different tone of conversation.