This is why jury duty and voting should have a check and balance other than age. She might be old enough on paper to vote, but she's still a bloody child.
So should voting but then you would only have the super rich vote.
With the amount of money our governments are spending no one is a net positive.
I paid 24k(income) in taxes up here in Canada but our government spent almost 40k per payer. Which would mean that rich and super rich would only get to vote since they are the only ones making over 40k.
I am not a zero sum game type were you hate on the rich.
If by "super rich" you mean someone who is a net positive to the text base? That's not super rich. That's just not a communist parasite voting for other people's money. Not a very high bar.
This is why jury duty and voting should have a check and balance other than age. She might be old enough on paper to vote, but she's still a bloody child.
Voting and jury duty should be tied to the individual being a net tax payer.
So should voting but then you would only have the super rich vote.
With the amount of money our governments are spending no one is a net positive. I paid 24k(income) in taxes up here in Canada but our government spent almost 40k per payer. Which would mean that rich and super rich would only get to vote since they are the only ones making over 40k.
I am not a zero sum game type were you hate on the rich.
If by "super rich" you mean someone who is a net positive to the text base? That's not super rich. That's just not a communist parasite voting for other people's money. Not a very high bar.