Pronoun military wahmen threatens Tucker Carlson
(archive.is)
Comments (25)
sorted by:
Safe space for moms. Yeah, that's the purpose and standard for a military.
For an entertaining thought experiment, can you imagine these people enlisting in the Imperial Roman Army of the 1st Century AD? They'd be wailing about their human rights whilst the First Centurion lays into them with his stick, laughing "Juno's cunt, you're a weak one."
That's ok: they think they can get the Irish to fight their wars for them. As though they'll want to, being guilty of the original sin of being White. Or are the Irish reverting back to being non-White?
The military has a long history of extremely safe places for mothers in on post housing as dependents.
Wars are extremely safe for women I heard.
https://archive.vn/eTECk http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1080493/Stalins-army-rapists-The-brutal-war-crime-Russia-Germany-tried-ignore.html
Marta was one of two million German women who were raped by soldiers of the Red Army - in her case, as in so many others, several times over.
Stalin said people should ' understand it if a soldier who has crossed thousands of kilometres through blood and fire and death has fun with a woman or takes some trifle'.
On another occasion, when told that Red Army soldiers sexually maltreated German refugees, he said: 'We lecture our soldiers too much; let them have their initiative.'
Socialists rape supposed National Socialists.
Socialist on socialist war crimes.
Military openly threatening their own private citizens, I didn't think the corruption had run this deep yet.
Remember when Colbert and the NYT were crying that death camps would be run by "fascist Trump".
https://archive.vn/oQ210
businessinsider 6 Nov 2020 09:37:10 UTC Stephen Colbert broke down in tears and called Trump a fascist after the president's conspiracy-laden rant at the White House Sonam Sheth
"You only survived this up until now because a lot of voters didn't want to believe everything that was obvious to so many of us, that Donald Trump is a fascist," Colbert said, adding that the GOP needs to "get off the Trump train" because "it's not a passenger train, and he'll load you on it sometime, too."
https://archive.vn/BfJAL nyt ‘Reach Out to Trump Supporters,’ They Said. I Tried. I give up.
By Wajahat Ali Contributing Opinion Writer Nov. 19, 2020
I reminded them that those who are now considered white, such as Irish Catholics, Eastern European Jews, Greeks and Italians, were once the boogeyman. I warned them that supporting white nationalism and Mr. Trump, in particular, would be self-destructive, an act of self-immolation, that will neither help their families or America become great again.
Still, not one told me they’d wavered in their support for him.
Other comments by her:
link - archive.org - archive.today
link - archive.org - archive.today
link - archive.org - archive.today
And it's supposed to be any wonder why America loses every war...
Hopefully also to the MPs/JAG. The UCMJ must have something to say on this
UCMJ: hides The Antifa Handbook and Saul Alinsky texts Ahem, she didnu nuffin.
If America loses wars, it's only by setting themselves unattainable standards for victory. Crushing your enemy and overthrowing their government in days with 10:1 kill ratios would be considered victory in any other war, and even that's America going easy on them. They could literally have won the war in Afghanistan in 30 minutes with zero casualties while achieving their strategic objectives.
Plus, that's an incorrect-ass statement.
The US' win to loss ratio on conflicts is weighted very heavily towards the W's.
The current "War on Terror", if they're even calling it that any longer, is a deliberately ceaseless quagmire that exists only to fill the coffers of those in the Military-Industrial Complex and their adjacent beneficiaries.
Victory was never an intended outcome.
Crushing a bunch of goatherds with jamming AK-47s isn't exactly something to brag about though. The Soviet Union managed to overthrow the Afghan government as well, but never managed to stay and win.
Why stay? We don't want Afghanistan, we just wanted the Taliban dead.
Afghanistan kills empires. The moment we got embroiled in that goatrope of a region, we were screwed.
I hope China fucks around over there soon enough; it'd be funny.
That sounds like some fan fiction stuff.
Let's see if the military gave her a working tank, instead of a toy one.
It's a woman so expect her to get it stuck in a ditch and have to call one of her (male) comrads to come pull her out.
>muh tanks
I would love to see her carry an M830 without falling over or crushing her own fingers.
Dear fucking god. Her twitter. FIlled with pictures of female in camos posing in front of relic tanks like its a fucking instagram or facebook post.
The US military is fucked beyond belief. We would be nothing without our billion dollar military toys.
All this military stuff reminds me of a youtube video I saw a few years ago, called Dogs, A.I, and Air Conditioning. It's by a guy named Colttaine, someone a few people here might already know of, since he's one of the few good content creators who talks about this kinda stuff. I highly recommend his videos, he seems smart and generally gives credible sources for his data.
In the video, he talks about this theory that the reason we've seen so much feminism permeating laws and culture recently, is because women as a collective keep finding "false positive" dangers to themselves, and women in general, in every facet of society.
Basically, humans are really good at pattern recognition, so good that we often see "false positives" for patterns we have evolved to recognize. For example, seeing "faces" on power outlets, or seeing clouds shaped like animals. It makes sense why we would evolve this trait. For a hunter walking through a forest, it's better to mistakenly see a face in some foliage then to not be able to detect a hungry predator lurking.
Now consider that women seem to have biologically evolved to detect danger to themselves before anything else, and combine this with the fact that our modern societies are far safer than the environments we evolved to survive in. The end result of this is that women in our current societies are detecting false positive after false positive in regards to threats to themselves, and women as a whole, due to their inherent biological nature.
I think that may be what's going on in the military right now. An example of life being perfectly safe for women, but due to their biological bias, they literally need to find a problem somewhere. Military perfectly safe for women? Nope, you never see pregnant women in the military, so OBVIOUSLY it's not safe enough for pregnant women! Voila, you have a new problem, a new danger to women as a whole, which must be fixed. And men will mostly just go along with it, perhaps because it's in our nature to do just that.
I see a lot of people say that recent feminism is the result of communism or globalism, and I won't deny the possibilities, but I think it could just be because of our basic biological nature. Particularly that of women, which causes them to perceive danger where none exists, and seek to eliminate that danger, even if the actual result goes directly against their own self interests. In this case, seeing more pregnant women serving in the military, which I can't see being beneficial for women at all.
Btw, sorry for not linking anything, I'm new here and still figuring out how commenting works. The vid should be easy enough to find though, and many sources of information are linked in the description.